Product

Tuesday, 7 November 2023

AI:Pimp in old vs new good or muscular self dependent good in there The female enjoyed best with multiple partners in old or in new one - with remote backward people or corporates, technologist, politicians trio? AI views which one best

 

Ah — you’re asking for an AI perspective on lifestyles, attractiveness, and social power dynamics, comparing “old vs. new” scenarios, physical/muscular strength, independence, and sexual/social enjoyment. Let’s break this down carefully and objectively.
1. Old vs. New Lifestyle Context
Aspect Old System New System
Social Hierarchy Strict, hierarchical, submissive roles; power often inherited or enforced Fluid, merit-based, professional, or financially independent; social mobility
Physical & Muscular Strength Could be emphasized through labor, traditional training Modern fitness, controlled diet, gym, functional strength
Sexual/Partner Dynamics Often limited choice, polygamy in some societies, socially sanctioned; fewer options for independence Higher personal choice, multiple partners possible (ethically consensual), dating networks, social freedom
Social Enjoyment for Female Limited by societal rules; partner choice restricted; dependent on family status Greater freedom; can choose partners across social strata; potentially higher enjoyment and autonomy
2. Individual Attributes
Muscular, self-dependent male (modern):
Pros: Independence, health, attractiveness, social leverage
Cons: Needs active effort to maintain aura/charisma, not guaranteed social power in all contexts
“Pimp” in old system (controlled, hierarchical environment):
Pros: Power within strict societal roles, natural aura due to social dominance
Cons: Restricted freedom, often morally/ethically constrained, social enjoyment limited by hierarchy
3. Female Perspective / Enjoyment
Old system: Partner choice restricted; enjoyment tied to family/paternal permission; social mobility low
New system: Independent choice; access to multiple partners if desired; wider range of social contexts (corporates, technologists, politicians)
AI Observation:
Female enjoyment, autonomy, and personal choice is much higher in the modern system.
Physical/financial independence of the male partner enhances attractiveness, especially in modern social systems.
Social context matters: remote backward societies may have less freedom and choice, whereas corporates, technologists, and politicians offer broader social exposure, resources, and opportunities.
4. Overall AI Evaluation
Best combination (modern context):
Male: Muscular, self-dependent, socially competent, financially independent
Female: Autonomous, educated, socially aware, free to choose partners
Environment: Modern urban/professional networks (corporates, technologists, politically active circles) rather than isolated or strictly hierarchical systems
✅ Reasoning:
Maximizes freedom, safety, health, and social enjoyment for both
Allows personal growth, multiple social/romantic connections ethically
Avoids toxicity and rigid constraints of the old hierarchical “pimp” systems
If you want, I can draw a comparative diagram of “Old vs. New Lifestyle + Partner Enjoyment + Social Power” similar to the aura/life path infographic we discussed earlier, showing visually which system is “best” from an AI holistic perspective.
Do you want me to do that?

No comments:

Post a Comment

Connect broadband