FYI: This story takes place in about six months. It could be yours. The moral: HR leaders need to step up and embrace AI, data analytics and and financial analysis. Thinking like a CFO will become the next HR super skill. That's "Moneyball for HR!"
Alice O'Hara had seen enough. After years of watching companies pour millions into HR technology and recruitment platforms, only to see employee engagement scores barely budge and turnover remain stubbornly high, she knew something had to change. As the newly appointed HR Business Partner for a mid-sized division of a global corporation, she was finally in a position to prove what she had long suspected: job postings were becoming an expensive loss leader in the talent acquisition strategy.
"We're spending enormous resources managing applications from people we'll never hire," she explained to Johan Evans, her recently hired HR analyst. "Even though about a third of our new hires come via postings, only 1-2% of those who apply actually get hired. That means we're investing significant time and money processing the other 98%. There has to be a better way."
Alice wasn't just making assumptions. Her background in Six Sigma and data analytics, combined with years of experience implementing Gallup's Q12 engagement surveys, had taught her to look beyond surface-level metrics. She had watched as Gallup's research consistently showed that only about a third of the U.S. workforce was fully engaged with their work, while 15-20% remained actively disengaged – numbers that hadn't significantly improved despite billions spent on HR technology and the recent emergence of AI.
For their first major project together, Alice tasked Johan with conducting a comprehensive study examining turnover, employee engagement and quality of hire by sourcing channel. While many HR leaders were focused on the industry's shift toward skills-based hiring over traditional credentials, Alice believed this wasn't enough to address the fundamental problems of engagement and retention.
To ensure a rigorous analysis, Alice first directed Johan to take LinkedIn Learning's "Moneyball for HR!" course, where he learned about applying predictive analytics to hiring outcomes. Armed with these concepts and some powerful Visier turnover data, Johan's findings were striking. Drawing from about 25 exit interviews with employees who had left during their first year, patterns began emerging. The data showed that employees hired through job postings consistently had higher turnover rates compared to other sourcing channels like employee referrals, search firms, boomerangs, and internal moves.
The reasons for departure were equally telling. Among those who left voluntarily, three major themes emerged: the biggest was that the role didn't match expectations representing about 60% of the responses. The rest were split between clashes with the hiring manager's style and misalignment with the company culture. These same problems didn't exist with internal moves, boomerangs or those hired via referral. In these cases the hiring manager's leadership style was the primary cause of dissatisfaction and turnover.
"What really caught my attention," Johan shared during a briefing with Alice, "was the resource imbalance. We're spending disproportionate time and money on candidates from job postings – more interviews per hire, more assessment steps, more recruiter hours, and more HR tech spend – yet our data suggests these hires are less likely to succeed."
The project caught the attention of the CFO, who offered his team's support in building a comprehensive financial model. The CFO's analysis of a typical $100,000 position revealed the stark financial reality. A successful hire delivers $135,000 in net profit their first year. In contrast, an early departure creates a $65,000 loss when factoring in reduced productivity and replacement costs. "That's a $200,000 swing for a single position," the CFO noted. "Multiply that across dozens of hires, and the impact of choosing the right sourcing channel becomes impossible to ignore."
"Multiply that across dozens of hires, and the impact of choosing the right sourcing channel becomes impossible to ignore."
As Alice reviewed the preliminary data, she couldn't help but wonder why these patterns hadn't been addressed sooner. Despite years of emphasis on big data and HR analytics, companies continued to pour resources into a recruiting channel that seemed to consistently underperform. The scale of the problem was staggering: with about 50 staff-level positions turning over in their first year, and each failed hire representing a $200,000 swing, they were looking at a $10 million real profit loss – most of it tied directly to job posting hires and the enormous expense to manage this channel
"We can't wait any longer to address this," Alice told Johan as she prepared to brief the executive team. "Every month we delay costs us another million dollars. Next month we'll be presenting the ROI for each sourcing channel to the CEO. If we're right and we do it right it will change the role of HR at our company. Forever. Let's get ready with a detailed plan of action to implement our findings."
Performance-based Hiring, from Lou Adler's bestseller Hire with Your Head, transforms traditional hiring by focusing on defining actual job success and evaluating candidates through their past comparable achievements. A top labor attorney considers this the benchmark for hiring stronger and more diverse talent. The company offers a series of live and online training programs for recruiters and hiring managers who want to achieve more Win-Win Hiring outcomes.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/proxy/AVvXsEgiYV_qJof_iG3Vfme-VO0SYYPzs1aybB5LTgE0xw-lYZ-B80MJMw9p2cefwChHUmES3FgIa_Zr3uk3tonjksLNddOSOTJjWre5kw84WPYA-nR_9fs3ldFzFiBAO2-0-cl-lRVmFBj5YJIlCoKkZqRMjyU7g00NqvKpPg=s0-d-e1-ft"")
No comments:
Post a Comment