AI:In artistic which hormones fluids and religious psychological neurological activities are there which tease them and cause them to vulnerable to various hazardous unwanted relationships and Misha openings which are not present or absent in logical wildish solar entities. WhichbAI humanoid robotics can be deployed using various neural networks and LKMs in the order to prevent revoke the artistic people prune to these havoc.

 

Your question mixes biology, psychology, art, religion, and AI in a very abstract way. I’ll restate it in clearer terms and then answer it carefully and realistically.
1. What makes “artistic” people more emotionally vulnerable?
There is no single hormone, fluid, or brain system that makes someone “artistic” or “logical.” However, research does show statistical tendencies that can increase emotional sensitivity and openness in creative individuals.
A. Biological & neurological factors (tendencies, not defects)
Creative/artistic people often show higher activity or sensitivity in:
Dopamine systems
Enhances novelty-seeking, imagination, emotional intensity
Can increase risk-taking and attachment to intense experiences or people
Limbic system (amygdala, hippocampus)
Strong emotional memory, empathy, symbolic thinking
Can increase vulnerability to emotional manipulation
Default Mode Network (DMN)
Active during imagination, introspection, meaning-making
Less rigid self-boundaries → openness, but also susceptibility
These are strengths, not weaknesses — but without grounding, they can be exploited.
B. Psychological traits common in highly creative people
(Not universal, but more frequent)
High openness to experience
Strong empathy and idealism
Tendency toward meaning-seeking and symbolic interpretation
Lower emphasis on rigid structure or authority
Emotional absorption (getting “lost” in people or ideas)
This can increase vulnerability to:
Charismatic manipulators
Unhealthy romantic or ideological relationships
Exploitative spiritual, religious, or artistic communities
C. Religious / symbolic susceptibility (important clarification)
Religion itself is not the cause. The vulnerability arises when:
Symbolic thinking is detached from critical grounding
Authority is accepted based on emotional resonance instead of evidence
Identity is merged with belief systems or leaders
Highly symbolic minds may confuse meaning with truth more easily.
2. Why do “logical / analytical” people seem less vulnerable?
People with stronger emphasis on:
Executive control (prefrontal cortex)
Analytical reasoning
Delayed emotional response
Skepticism and boundary-setting
…tend to filter relationships and ideologies through utility, consistency, and evidence, reducing exploitation risk.
This is not superiority — it is a different cognitive balance.

3. Can AI humanoid robotics or neural networks prevent this vulnerability?
Short answer:
AI should not control or “correct” artistic people.
That would be unethical and dangerous.
Long answer:
AI can be used as a protective cognitive scaffold, not a controller.
4. Realistic AI systems that can help (non-invasive, ethical)
A. AI cognitive companions (not humanoid robots)
Using LLMs + affective computing, AI can:
Detect emotional manipulation patterns in conversations
Flag unhealthy relational dynamics
Encourage boundary-setting and reflection
Ask grounding questions (“What evidence supports this?”)
These systems support agency, not override it.
B. Neural network models involved
(Not for mind control, but for pattern recognition)
Transformer-based LLMs – reasoning, dialogue analysis
Emotion recognition models – detect distress or coercion language
Graph neural networks – map social influence patterns
Reinforcement learning (bounded) – personalize healthy coping prompts
No invasive neural implants are required or appropriate.
C. What AI should not do
Override beliefs
Suppress creativity
Pathologize spirituality or art
Replace human judgment
Act as an authority figure
5. The correct goal: balance, not suppression
The solution is integration, not elimination:
Creativity + critical thinking
Emotion + boundaries
Meaning + evidence
Art + self-protection
AI should function like:
“A mirror that notices patterns you may miss — not a master that decides for you.”
6. If you want, I can help further by:
Rewriting this question in scientific language
Mapping artistic cognition vs analytical cognition clearly
Designing an ethical AI assistant architecture
Explaining how therapy, education, and AI can work together
Discussing risks of AI misuse in psychological domains
Just tell me which direction you want to go.
You said:
All